|
|
Earlier in 2010, Family Tree DNA (FTDNA) introduced a new DNA test – the Family Finder test. I was contacted by FTDNA and invited to be one of their “pre-launch” testers for this new product. I went ahead and did it as it hold some exciting possibilities.
The Family Finder test is different from the mtDNA test which only looks at the lineage through the mother’s mother – the matrilineal line. It’s also different from the traditional Y-DNA test which can only be done by men and trace’s the patrilineal line. The family finder test uses the 22 autosomal chromosomes to look for relatives from the “middle branches” of your family tree. In other words, it will find relatives of your mother’s father’s family and your father’s mother’s family. It does not just look at the matrilineal and patrilineal lines. The Family Finder test claims they can find with a high degree of confidence, cousins up to the 5th cousin level. This effectively can trace the lineage back up to your great-great-grandparents. However, it could potentially connect cousins together who have common ancestors much farther back.
As an example, even though I was one of the first people to do this test through FTDNA and it is a relatively new test, I have had several matches already. One of those matches, FTDNA determined could be a cousin at the “4th cousin to distant cousin” level and did not show up in my “close and immediate” matches category. In other words, they thought we were cousins, but couldn’t be sure due to the number of generations removed from the common ancestor. This gentleman contacted me anyway. He asked if I would like to investigate with him how we were related. I agreed and we exchanged our GEDCOM files. I found a neat little program called GENMatcher which would compare every person in 2 different GEDCOM files and return a list of probable matches. This program produced a listing of 18 common ancestors between myself and this gentleman – 9 married couples. After examining these common ancestors through both of our GEDCOM files, I discovered that the closest he and I were related was at the 9th Cousin level, although we have many common ancestors. He and I never would have connected without this test.
According to the FTDNA website, the chances of finding 2nd cousins or closer is 99%, 3rd cousins 90%, 4th cousins is 50% and 5th cousins are about 10%. Anything beyond that is a “remote” chance – typically less than 2%. Probably the reason why this gentleman and I matched is because we had so many different ancestors in common – they all were not in one line. Some matched through my father’s side of the family, but many matched through my mother’s side of the family.
This test is still in its infancy, being released by FTDNA in April 2010. But, I would encourage others to have this test done. You never know how you might be related to someone else!
Yes, I said dust your computer! At least once a year – or more often, open the computer up and dust the inside of your computer. The dust that accumulates inside your computer acts as a blanket keeping things nice and toasty – which is NOT a good thing for computer components. Computers need to be kept “cool” so they don’t overheat and break down. Think about it – what happens to your car if the engine overheats? The car doesn’t just keep going – nope, you end up stuck on the side of the road (hopefully and not in the middle of the road) having to call a tow truck and having a huge repair bill. Well, computers will do the same thing if they aren’t kept cool – the only difference is you won’t be on the side of the road.
 Before - the CPU fan is caked with dirt from a lack of cleaning. Do NOT let this happen to your computer!
The dirt on the fan makes the fan work harder to circulate the air. The dirt that is caked on top of the heat sink – below the fan blades blocks the airflow from the heat sink. This allows the heat sink to get hotter than it should, which means your processor (CPU) is hotter than it should be. This could cause your computer to stop functioning all together!
 After - the heatsink and fan have been cleaned up.
This is after hosing down the heat sink and fan – nice and clean (yes, there’s still a little bit of dirt – but it is cleaner than it was!). Now the air can circulate through this heat sink and fan unit much more efficiently, keeping the whole unit cooler which keeps the processor (CPU) cooler. The fan doesn’t have to work so hard at rotating since the fan blades no longer have caked dirt loading them down.
I recently became a member of the Network of Founding Families Genealogies due in part to my research into my family history. I had engaged the services of their genealogist, Richard Ripley, to find the parents of William Doonan. Thanks to the research that I had already done, Richard was able to find not just the parents of William, but his grandparents and great-grandparents in the Doonan line. We also discovered some siblings for William and their descendants. This also lead me to find the parents and ancestry for William’s third wife Rosie Smith. 
I took and passed the certification exam on June 2 for Windows 7, Configuring. This means I am now a Microsoft Certified Technology Specialist. I am now one step closer to graduation with the B.S. in Information Technology.

This morning I received an email from another participant in the Family Finder DNA that is done through Family Tree DNA. Our match indicated a possible 4th cousin to distant cousin relationship – but was not flagged as a “close relationship”.
The gentleman emailed me and gave me a link to his family tree on rootsweb.com. In looking at his Ahnentafel report that I could generate on rootsweb, I discovered that we indeed were cousins! The connection is “way back” – Isaac Cummings born 1601 in England and died 1677 in Massachusetts. I descend from his son Isaac and my newly found cousin is a descendant of John – a brother of my Isaac Jr. I incorporated what I could of his file (to his father only) into my database for a quick calculation and it turns out that his father and I are 9th cousins 3x removed.
So, the Family Finder DNA test from Family Tree DNA worked at finding me a very distant cousin. So far, no luck finding the connection with the two people who should be 4th cousins. But the search is on!
Family Tree DNA has introduced a new DNA test – the Family Finder. I was invited to take the test as part of their “pre-launch” since I had already had my mtDNA test done with them. It was to help them establish a database for when they officially launched the product I’m sure.
My results came back and to my astonishment I had one “close” match immediately – someone who FTDNA believes to be a 4th cousin of mine. So, I contacted her to find out how we might be related. Just a couple of days later, I receive an email from someone else whose results just came in and we also show 4th cousin relationship. Amazing!
Now the hard work begins. The Family Finder test will find relatives not just along the paternal or maternal lines – but the in-between branches. The Y-DNA test is for males – and traces the paternal line only – so your father, his father, his father, etc. The mtDNA test is for the female line – tracing your mother, her mother, her mother, etc. The family finder would trace the father’s mother, the mother’s father, etc. The test is supposed to be good for matching within the last 5 generations.
On first contact with my new found “cousins”, I offered some surnames asking if the names sounded familiar – unfortunately neither of them had the same surnames. But, if this test could match anywhere in the last 5 generations – that’s a lot of people to go through – male and female.
Today, I had a brainstorm. I created a new subset of my genealogy database – one that contains people only from my last 6 generations and their descendants. I then took my RootsMagic Software and generated 2 distinct reports – one for places with events listed (this gives the name of the person in the place on a specific date) and the other one just for surnames. I have sent these 2 documents to my matches to see if that will trigger anything.
I was astonished at how big my reports were though for just 6 generations back. The place list turned out to be 93 pages long. The surname list was 15.5 pages long! There are over 2000 names in this 6 generation database. I have been able to identify 24 unique individuals who are my 3rd Great Grandparents. 3 unique individuals at the 2nd Great Grandparent level (I don’t know who their parents are yet). And I don’t have all descendants! Here are some other interesting stats:
| Individual Statistics |
All |
Male |
Female |
Unknown |
| Individuals Selected |
2321 |
1177 |
1139 |
5 |
| Individuals with marriage event |
867 |
429 |
438 |
0 |
| Average age at marriage |
24.49 |
26.47 |
22.55 |
NA |
| Minimum age at marriage |
13.58 |
15.00 |
13.58 |
NA |
| Maximum age at marriage |
80.00 |
75.00 |
80.00 |
NA |
| Individuals with death age |
584 |
319 |
264 |
1 |
| Average age at death |
56.17 |
56.73 |
55.69 |
0.00 |
| Minimum age at death |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
| Maximum age at death |
104.25 |
102.75 |
104.25 |
0.00 |
Now for the really long list – how frequently the surnames appear within the last 6 generations (from me – not the generation of my niece/nephew):
| Surname |
All |
Male |
Female |
Earliest |
Most recent |
| MUNSON |
144 |
73 |
68 |
1818 |
2008 |
| HICKMOTT |
141 |
84 |
57 |
1786 |
2010 |
| (unknown surname) |
107 |
7 |
100 |
1805 |
1998 |
| JONES |
73 |
42 |
31 |
1830 |
2000 |
| STILES |
56 |
31 |
25 |
1827 |
2009 |
| RIVERS |
56 |
29 |
27 |
1822 |
2000 |
| LACY |
54 |
28 |
25 |
1790 |
1996 |
| GOWARD |
43 |
27 |
16 |
1837 |
1990 |
| DOONAN |
37 |
22 |
15 |
1799 |
1981 |
| WICKHAM |
34 |
14 |
19 |
1800 |
1971 |
| WORTMAN |
24 |
13 |
11 |
1809 |
1943 |
| SAVAGE |
24 |
9 |
15 |
1909 |
1992 |
| ROLFE |
20 |
12 |
8 |
1871 |
1990 |
| YEAGER |
17 |
8 |
9 |
1891 |
1997 |
| SMITH |
17 |
9 |
8 |
1833 |
1953 |
| MURROW |
17 |
10 |
7 |
1861 |
1995 |
| DAVIS |
17 |
8 |
9 |
1852 |
1917 |
| SEEGMILLER |
16 |
8 |
8 |
1950 |
1959 |
| HAMPTON |
16 |
8 |
8 |
1935 |
1998 |
| SPENCER |
15 |
6 |
9 |
1907 |
1966 |
| LAWHEAD |
15 |
7 |
8 |
1821 |
1967 |
| WALKER |
13 |
9 |
4 |
1844 |
1973 |
| ROAT |
13 |
10 |
3 |
1901 |
1988 |
| PASSMORE |
13 |
8 |
5 |
1911 |
1983 |
| JOHNSON |
13 |
9 |
4 |
1903 |
1970 |
| GLASBY |
13 |
8 |
5 |
1855 |
1970 |
| DELGADO |
13 |
6 |
7 |
1911 |
1983 |
| BAKER |
13 |
6 |
7 |
1917 |
1975 |
| TRAUB |
12 |
8 |
4 |
1908 |
1987 |
| PETERS |
12 |
6 |
6 |
1893 |
2008 |
| SANFORD |
11 |
6 |
5 |
1850 |
1985 |
| STANBARGER |
10 |
4 |
6 |
1933 |
1965 |
| SCHAUB |
10 |
3 |
7 |
1878 |
1950 |
| BERGER |
10 |
4 |
6 |
1927 |
1966 |
| BARNETT |
10 |
4 |
6 |
1840 |
1982 |
| QUINN |
9 |
3 |
6 |
1945 |
1957 |
| PERRY |
9 |
6 |
3 |
1858 |
1891 |
| PAPPENHEIMER |
9 |
5 |
4 |
1924 |
1951 |
| MIRAFLOR |
9 |
5 |
4 |
1920 |
1978 |
| BRICKEL |
9 |
4 |
5 |
1930 |
2002 |
| WILSON |
8 |
5 |
3 |
1894 |
1990 |
| WHEELER |
8 |
4 |
4 |
1938 |
1973 |
| WALWORTH |
8 |
5 |
3 |
1908 |
1977 |
| SEIGMILLER |
8 |
4 |
4 |
1886 |
1998 |
| PHILLIPS |
8 |
4 |
4 |
1897 |
1986 |
| MEEKER |
8 |
6 |
2 |
1838 |
1929 |
| HARRINGTON |
8 |
4 |
4 |
1957 |
2000 |
| GRAY |
8 |
4 |
4 |
1932 |
1975 |
| FEDDER |
8 |
5 |
3 |
1868 |
2007 |
| CLARK |
8 |
5 |
3 |
1861 |
2000 |
| THOMAS |
7 |
5 |
2 |
1938 |
1938 |
| SUMMERS |
7 |
4 |
3 |
1927 |
1968 |
| STADNIKIA |
7 |
4 |
3 |
1931 |
1969 |
| SERR |
7 |
6 |
1 |
1888 |
1963 |
| PARKER |
7 |
4 |
3 |
1851 |
1956 |
| NYE |
7 |
5 |
2 |
1827 |
1928 |
| KNIGHT |
7 |
5 |
2 |
1886 |
1914 |
| DE BOLT |
7 |
3 |
4 |
1882 |
1999 |
| COLLINS |
7 |
1 |
6 |
1903 |
2002 |
| BRIGGS |
7 |
6 |
1 |
1913 |
1955 |
| VAUTHEROT |
6 |
1 |
5 |
1884 |
1965 |
| SNYDER |
6 |
4 |
2 |
1883 |
1956 |
| RIVERA |
6 |
4 |
2 |
1923 |
2001 |
| RAWZA |
6 |
2 |
4 |
1916 |
1974 |
| PORTIS |
6 |
3 |
3 |
1820 |
1862 |
| PIERSON |
6 |
5 |
1 |
1935 |
1967 |
| MERRIMAN |
6 |
5 |
1 |
1911 |
1943 |
| MEHL |
6 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
| LEONARD |
6 |
4 |
2 |
1908 |
1995 |
| KETTLER |
6 |
3 |
3 |
|
|
| KELLER |
6 |
2 |
4 |
1947 |
1961 |
| HOLMES |
6 |
1 |
5 |
1956 |
1994 |
| GROSS |
6 |
6 |
0 |
1928 |
1971 |
| CRUMBACK |
6 |
5 |
1 |
1889 |
1892 |
| CARLTON |
6 |
4 |
2 |
1916 |
2008 |
| BISHOP |
6 |
3 |
3 |
1927 |
1961 |
| YANCER |
5 |
5 |
0 |
1906 |
2004 |
| WHITNEY |
5 |
1 |
4 |
1822 |
1906 |
| SIMMONS |
5 |
4 |
1 |
1890 |
2002 |
| SHAW |
5 |
3 |
2 |
1859 |
1983 |
| SANDERSON |
5 |
4 |
1 |
1935 |
1963 |
| PETRIE |
5 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
| MOORE |
5 |
2 |
3 |
1918 |
2000 |
| MANN |
5 |
2 |
3 |
1958 |
1967 |
| LANE |
5 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
| JARRETT |
5 |
3 |
2 |
1898 |
1935 |
| GARRISON |
5 |
3 |
2 |
1866 |
1978 |
| FENNER |
5 |
3 |
2 |
|
|
| COUNTERMAN |
5 |
2 |
3 |
1933 |
1981 |
| CONFER |
5 |
4 |
1 |
1898 |
1986 |
| CLAUD |
5 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
| BURDEN |
5 |
3 |
2 |
1911 |
1964 |
| ACKERMAN |
5 |
4 |
1 |
1934 |
1963 |
| VAUGHN |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1935 |
1969 |
| TAYLOR |
4 |
4 |
0 |
1907 |
1993 |
| SLOAT |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1874 |
1984 |
| REED |
4 |
3 |
1 |
1879 |
1946 |
| PAYEA |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1977 |
1983 |
| PARMER |
4 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
| NORTON |
4 |
3 |
1 |
1945 |
1976 |
| MOON |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1884 |
1956 |
| LYTLE |
4 |
4 |
0 |
|
|
| HOLIHAN |
4 |
1 |
3 |
1954 |
1954 |
| HENIGE |
4 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
| HABBERSHAW |
4 |
3 |
1 |
1892 |
1986 |
| GAJEWSKI |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1945 |
1957 |
| EARLY |
4 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
| DEBOLT |
4 |
2 |
2 |
|
|
| DANIELS |
4 |
3 |
1 |
1948 |
1984 |
| COOK |
4 |
3 |
1 |
|
|
| CARTER |
4 |
1 |
3 |
|
|
| CALLOW |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1875 |
1903 |
| BROKENSHAW |
4 |
3 |
1 |
1869 |
1992 |
| BRISTOL |
4 |
1 |
3 |
1933 |
1961 |
| BENNETT |
4 |
2 |
2 |
1851 |
1968 |
| WOOLL |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1904 |
1961 |
| WOOD |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1888 |
1986 |
| WHITE |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1844 |
1911 |
| WARD |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1875 |
2000 |
| THOMPSON |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1834 |
1860 |
| SURSAW |
3 |
3 |
0 |
1891 |
1966 |
| STAHL |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1855 |
1880 |
| RICHARDS |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1996 |
1996 |
| REIKOWSKY |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1914 |
1977 |
| POMERANING |
3 |
3 |
0 |
1947 |
1947 |
| PARTLOW |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1942 |
1988 |
| MUMFORD |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1951 |
1977 |
| MORGAN |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1960 |
1960 |
| MCLEAN |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1902 |
1962 |
| LOUKES |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1885 |
1923 |
| LINTON |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1939 |
1966 |
| LEROY |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1881 |
1976 |
| LAFLEUR |
3 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
| KRAMER |
3 |
3 |
0 |
1947 |
1978 |
| KIRBY |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1895 |
1983 |
| KESSLER |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1974 |
1976 |
| HENRY |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1920 |
1990 |
| HAND |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1847 |
1891 |
| HALL |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1818 |
1854 |
| GIBBS |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1825 |
1914 |
| FULLER |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1973 |
1973 |
| DICK |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
| CHURCH |
3 |
3 |
0 |
|
|
| BONNAU |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1881 |
1924 |
| BIGLER |
3 |
3 |
0 |
1875 |
1958 |
| BEACH |
3 |
2 |
1 |
1920 |
1980 |
| BARLOW |
3 |
0 |
3 |
1928 |
1937 |
| AUSTIN |
3 |
0 |
3 |
1869 |
1955 |
| ALLISON |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1824 |
1877 |
| ALLEN |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1949 |
1949 |
| WILLIAMS |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1955 |
1968 |
| WIELAND |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1964 |
1964 |
| WATSON |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1922 |
2002 |
| WAGNER |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
| TEMPLE |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
| TANDESKI |
2 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
| TALCOTT |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1940 |
1964 |
| SWEET |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1941 |
1941 |
| STROUSE |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1883 |
1964 |
| STEVENS |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
| STAUDACKER |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
| SPOHN |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1918 |
1993 |
| SHEPPARD |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1912 |
1976 |
| RODGERS |
2 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
| RICHARDSON |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1876 |
1967 |
| POWELL |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1798 |
1894 |
| POTTER |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1794 |
1888 |
| PICKERING |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
| PATRICK |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1801 |
1953 |
| PALMER |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
| ORR |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1958 |
1958 |
| NELSON |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1948 |
1948 |
| MOSS |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1859 |
1936 |
| MCCORMICK |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1885 |
1988 |
| MARTIN |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
| MARSHAL |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1841 |
1857 |
| MALLORY |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1882 |
1882 |
| LUTZ |
2 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
| LOUCH |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1917 |
1999 |
| LAKE |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1831 |
1974 |
| LACLAIR |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1900 |
1940 |
| KYLE |
2 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
| KUCHARCZYK |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1963 |
1964 |
| KOSA |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1955 |
1955 |
| KING |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1839 |
1955 |
| KENNEDY |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1870 |
1958 |
| KEITH |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1948 |
1948 |
| HYDE |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
| HUTCHINS |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1871 |
1965 |
| HINOJOSA |
2 |
2 |
0 |
|
|
| HILL |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
| HICKMOTT, JR |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1945 |
2005 |
| HARRIS |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1918 |
1976 |
| HARBRIDGE |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1959 |
1959 |
| GORDON |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1926 |
2001 |
| FROST |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1893 |
1971 |
| FOSTER |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1820 |
1820 |
| FETTING |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
| FERGUSON |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1937 |
1937 |
| EVERETT |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1906 |
1975 |
| EMERSON |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1853 |
1853 |
| CUMMINS |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1920 |
1920 |
| CUMMINGS |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1881 |
1943 |
| CONKLIN |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1845 |
1908 |
| CLIFFORD |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1895 |
1895 |
| CHANDLER |
2 |
0 |
2 |
1867 |
1959 |
| CASTER |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1846 |
1877 |
| CARPENTER |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
| BRUNI-CLEMENTELLI |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
| BROWNELL |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1864 |
1910 |
| BROWN |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
| BOYER |
2 |
2 |
0 |
1862 |
1862 |
| BOGGS |
2 |
0 |
2 |
|
|
| ALDRICH |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1854 |
1854 |
| ZORN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| ZIRKLE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1916 |
1975 |
| ZIMMERMAN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1936 |
1936 |
| ZEITZ |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1912 |
1912 |
| YURGENS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1903 |
1991 |
| YERRICK |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1948 |
1948 |
| YAGER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1926 |
1926 |
| WYETH |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| WRIGHT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1966 |
1966 |
| WORDEN |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1842 |
1842 |
| WOOLEY |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| WOODRING |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1953 |
1953 |
| WOODCOCK |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1903 |
1995 |
| WOODBURY |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| WONTORCIK |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| WOLLPERT |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| WOLFE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1896 |
1896 |
| WISNIEWSKI |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| WILLIAMSON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1963 |
1963 |
| WILLETT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| WILHILM |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| WILCOX |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1950 |
1950 |
| WIERS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| WHITT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| WHITING |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1900 |
1975 |
| WHICHENHAGAN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1943 |
2001 |
| WETMORE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| WERT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| WENZLICK |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1925 |
1925 |
| WELLINGTON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1959 |
1959 |
| WELCH |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1888 |
1968 |
| WEISENBURGER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1966 |
1966 |
| WEIRAUCH |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| WEIRACH |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| WEBSTER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1939 |
1939 |
| WEBER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1944 |
1944 |
| WEBBER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1910 |
1984 |
| WARREN |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1961 |
1961 |
| WARNER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1904 |
1904 |
| WARE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1828 |
1902 |
| WALTERS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1903 |
1970 |
| WAKEFIELD |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1831 |
1888 |
| WADE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1951 |
1979 |
| VRABLE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| VORST |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| VOLTZ |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| VOLPE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| VINSON III |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| VINCENT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| VERNER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| VERKENNES |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1954 |
1954 |
| VEALE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1901 |
1976 |
| VAUGN |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| VAUGHAN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1929 |
1929 |
| VANWAGONER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| VANSTRATE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1912 |
1982 |
| VANSICKLE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| VANMATRE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| VANDERBUILT |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| VANCE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| VALLANCE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1930 |
1930 |
| VAISONEN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| UNSUK |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| TURNER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| TUCKER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| TRASTER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1944 |
1944 |
| TOTTEN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| TODD |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1913 |
1981 |
| TIMMEL |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1959 |
1959 |
| THIEL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1954 |
1954 |
| TARZWELL WEILAND |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| TARSITES |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1969 |
1969 |
| TAGGET |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| SYWYK |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1940 |
1940 |
| SWIFT |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SWAIN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| SUPES |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| SUAZO |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1938 |
1938 |
| SUAREZ |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| STURTZ |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1922 |
2000 |
| STUART |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1889 |
1993 |
| STROH |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| STROBEL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| STRICKLAND |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1960 |
1960 |
| STOUTS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1807 |
1891 |
| STORY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1916 |
1916 |
| STOKES |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| STOCKWELL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| STOCKER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| STINSON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1920 |
1988 |
| STIFF |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1922 |
1984 |
| STIENHORST |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| STEWART |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| STERBA |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| STEKETEE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| STEDMAN |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| STARK |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| STANZEL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1905 |
1976 |
| STANLEY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1961 |
1961 |
| STACK |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| ST. CHARLES |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1873 |
1920 |
| SPRINGALL |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SPOUSE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SPIEGEL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1908 |
1908 |
| SPAYDE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1918 |
1980 |
| SPARLING |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| SORENSON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1952 |
1952 |
| SOMMERVILLE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SOLDAN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1953 |
1953 |
| SOKOLA |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SNOW |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SMYTHERS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SMOOT |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SMARCH |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SKYM |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SKINNER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SKABARDIS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| SIKORA |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SIKES |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SHUTTLEWORTH |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1924 |
1924 |
| SHORT |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SHIELDS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| SHEARS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SHEARER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SHARROW |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SCRIBNER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SCOTT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| SCHULTZ |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1914 |
1914 |
| SCHROEDER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1911 |
1998 |
| SCHRAMM |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1944 |
1944 |
| SCHOOLER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SCHOMBER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SCHOFIELD |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1952 |
1952 |
| SCHNEIDER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SCHMITT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| SCHLICKER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1936 |
1936 |
| SCHLESE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1961 |
1961 |
| SCHELL |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SARSFIELD |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| SANTINO |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| SANQUINETTE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| SANDY |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| SANDS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1965 |
1965 |
| SALVI |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| RUSSELL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1914 |
1977 |
| ROSS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| ROMO |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1969 |
1969 |
| ROBINSON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| ROBERTSON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1959 |
1959 |
| ROBERTS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| RIVERS, JR |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1930 |
1930 |
| RITTERSCAMP |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| RISING |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| RICH |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| RICE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1923 |
1923 |
| REVERE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| REVELS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| REMER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| REMENDER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| REITZEL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1922 |
1922 |
| REINHART |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| REESE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1942 |
1985 |
| REAGAN |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| RAYMOND |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| RAYLES |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| RANDALL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1899 |
1951 |
| RADLOFF |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| RACETTE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1948 |
1983 |
| QUARDERER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| QUALLS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1963 |
1963 |
| PROWSE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| PRINCE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1956 |
1956 |
| POND |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1828 |
1908 |
| POLZIN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| POGOMORE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| PODURAN |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1946 |
1946 |
| PICKNIK |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| PHYLLAIERE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1900 |
1900 |
| PHETTEPLACE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1911 |
1976 |
| PFEIFFER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1875 |
1952 |
| PEVLER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1890 |
1890 |
| PETTIS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1911 |
1911 |
| PETHPLACE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1844 |
1844 |
| PERKINS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| PENNELL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1934 |
1934 |
| PEARSON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| PAYNE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1952 |
2007 |
| PATTERSON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1901 |
1901 |
| PASQUALE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| PARKS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| PAINTER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1894 |
1980 |
| PAINS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| PACK |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| OWEN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1843 |
1911 |
| OSTRANDER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| OSTIPOW |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| OSMOND |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| ORTNER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1937 |
1937 |
| ORTIZ |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| ORDWAY |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1914 |
1914 |
| OLIVER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| O’DELL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1838 |
1865 |
| NOYCE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| NOWAK |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| NOVAK |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| NORDAN |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| NOLAN |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| NIX |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| NIEMEGER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| NICKLYN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| NESTELL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| NEELEY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1908 |
1989 |
| NACHTMAN |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| MURPHY |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| MUMROW |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1918 |
1998 |
| MOULTON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1923 |
1923 |
| MOSLEY, JR |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1950 |
1950 |
| MORTON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1811 |
1811 |
| MONTLE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1876 |
1876 |
| MONTGOMERY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| MONTES |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1896 |
1928 |
| MONEY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| MILLAN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1883 |
1962 |
| MILES |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| MEGLATHIN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1955 |
1955 |
| MCKINISTRY |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1825 |
1825 |
| MCINTOSH |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| MCCLOSKY |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| MCCARTEY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| MCALPINE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| MATTARELLA |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| MASNER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1857 |
1874 |
| MARSHALL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1860 |
1860 |
| MARSH |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1904 |
1957 |
| MALONE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1930 |
1930 |
| MALLINI |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1929 |
1929 |
| MALECKI |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1927 |
1927 |
| MAITTROTT |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1948 |
1948 |
| MAHER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| MADER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| LYLE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1881 |
1881 |
| LYBARKER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| LUFT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1935 |
1935 |
| LUCHENBILL |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1944 |
1944 |
| LOWERY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1914 |
1914 |
| LOVE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1871 |
1920 |
| LOSANO |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| LOPER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| LONSWAY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1942 |
1942 |
| LOCKWOOD |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1886 |
1914 |
| LEVITT |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| LEVICK |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1949 |
1949 |
| LEMASTER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| LEE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| LEATHERS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1910 |
1970 |
| LEACH |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| LAYNER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1953 |
1953 |
| LAWRENCE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| LAVERE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| LAUBACK |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1915 |
1999 |
| LASSILA |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1964 |
1964 |
| LAPAN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1970 |
1970 |
| LANPHER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| LANNING |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1963 |
1963 |
| LANGS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1855 |
1855 |
| LANGMAN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| LANGLEY |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| LANGE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| LAMPHERE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1876 |
1876 |
| LAMBART |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1955 |
1955 |
| LALONDE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1901 |
1961 |
| LAIDLAW |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1889 |
1979 |
| LAFRENIER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| KRUGER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1901 |
1959 |
| KRISELER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1947 |
1947 |
| KOBYLENSKI |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1952 |
1952 |
| KNOTTS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1961 |
1961 |
| KNIEPER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1904 |
1991 |
| KNAPP |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| KLUMP |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| KITELINGER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1893 |
1970 |
| KISRO |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| KINGSLEY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1849 |
1849 |
| KENNY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1961 |
1961 |
| KEENE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| KASPER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| KARON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| KAMO |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1959 |
1959 |
| JOUNCER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| JONES SR |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| JOLES |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1884 |
1884 |
| JOHANNING |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1927 |
1927 |
| JEWELL |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| JEWBAR |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1852 |
1852 |
| JERNIGANS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| JENSEN |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| JARLOCK |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1944 |
1944 |
| JAQUITH |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1836 |
1864 |
| JANNI |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1954 |
1954 |
| JAMEISON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| JAECK |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| JACKSON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1884 |
1884 |
| IVY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1950 |
1950 |
| IMLER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1938 |
1938 |
| ILLIKMAN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1891 |
1988 |
| HYATT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1912 |
1998 |
| HUBBELL |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| HOWARD |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1850 |
1850 |
| HOUSE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| HOULIHAN |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| HORNING |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1959 |
1959 |
| HOPSON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1877 |
1877 |
| HOPKINS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1965 |
1965 |
| HOOVER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| HOLTON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| HOGAN |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1928 |
1928 |
| HOFSTETTER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1925 |
2006 |
| HLADIK |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| HIRSCHENBERGER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| HIPOLITE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1895 |
1930 |
| HIDDEN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1916 |
1916 |
| HICKS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1935 |
1935 |
| HICKMOTT(WEBBER) |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1961 |
1961 |
| HETTINGER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1932 |
1932 |
| HERZIG |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1884 |
1975 |
| HENDRICK |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| HEMSTREET |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| HEMERLINE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1946 |
1946 |
| HEBERLING |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| HARTZ |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1970 |
1970 |
| HART |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1874 |
1946 |
| HARRIMAN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| HARPER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| HARMON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| HANSON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| HAMM |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| HAMILTON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| HALLOCK |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1895 |
1895 |
| HAGON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| HAGAN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1962 |
1962 |
| HADLEY |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| HADDAD |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1964 |
1964 |
| HAASE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| GURWITZ, MAHLER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| GUNDERS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| GULLIVER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1951 |
1951 |
| GRUBBS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1964 |
1964 |
| GREEN |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1957 |
1957 |
| GRAVES |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1867 |
1890 |
| GRANTHAM |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1964 |
1964 |
| GRABEEL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1916 |
1963 |
| GOWING |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1887 |
1887 |
| GOODKNECHT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1902 |
1926 |
| GOODELL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1950 |
1950 |
| GOLD |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| GOETZE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1933 |
1933 |
| GODDARD |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| GOBLE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1913 |
1998 |
| GNETKASSKI |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1963 |
1963 |
| GLOUER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| GLASSCOCK |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1892 |
1979 |
| GILSON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1823 |
1851 |
| GILMOUR |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1961 |
1961 |
| GILLESPIE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| GIBSON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| GETTY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1933 |
1995 |
| GARDNER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| GARBYZEWSKI |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| FUESTER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1913 |
1959 |
| FRAPPIK |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| FRANSON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| FORSYTHE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1946 |
1946 |
| FLYNN |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| FLORY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1910 |
1983 |
| FLORS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| FLORENCE M. |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1885 |
1967 |
| FLORE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1961 |
1961 |
| FITCH |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| FIELD |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| FARLEY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1931 |
1931 |
| FALL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1860 |
1945 |
| FALKENHAGEN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| FAIST |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| FAIRCHILD |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| EVENSON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| EVANS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| ELLWOOD |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| ELLIOT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1881 |
1954 |
| ELDRED |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1914 |
1914 |
| ELDER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1957 |
1957 |
| ELBRIDGE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1938 |
2006 |
| EFTANK |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1960 |
1960 |
| DUTCHER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| DUDEK |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| DUBY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1922 |
1998 |
| DOYLE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1893 |
1893 |
| DOWEN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1887 |
1948 |
| DOUTRE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| DORAN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1870 |
1928 |
| DONNELLY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| DODGE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1948 |
1948 |
| DIPIERO |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| DIMON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| DILL |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| DICKSON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1887 |
1957 |
| DICKENSON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| DEWITT |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| DEWEY |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| DEMERAST |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| DELONG |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| DELAY |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1948 |
1948 |
| DEL VALLE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1952 |
1952 |
| DECKROW |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| DE NOYER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| DAWSON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1874 |
1976 |
| DAVID |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| DAVENPORT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1957 |
1957 |
| DARLING |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1957 |
1957 |
| DAMIC |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| CURCIO |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1940 |
1940 |
| CSUTORUS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| CROSSMAN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| CRAWFORD |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| CRAMER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1882 |
1882 |
| COWLES |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1956 |
1956 |
| COUNTERMAN, JR |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1960 |
1960 |
| COTY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1919 |
1919 |
| COPELAN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| COOPER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| COOLEY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1941 |
1941 |
| CONLEY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1834 |
1834 |
| COLEMAN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1924 |
1997 |
| COLE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| COLBY |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1858 |
1858 |
| CIMMERER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| CHURCHILL |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1932 |
1932 |
| CHILDS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1950 |
1950 |
| CHEVEZ |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| CHENIER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| CHELL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1954 |
1954 |
| CARYL |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1916 |
2000 |
| CARLTON, JR |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1940 |
1940 |
| CARLETON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1949 |
1949 |
| CARD |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1860 |
1860 |
| CAMPBELL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1936 |
1936 |
| BUTLER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| BURRILL |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| BURNS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| BURNFELD |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1848 |
1848 |
| BURKHARDT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1948 |
1948 |
| BURGER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| BRYCE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| BRYAN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1953 |
1953 |
| BROOM |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1924 |
1992 |
| BROOKS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
2002 |
2002 |
| BRODERICK |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1957 |
1957 |
| BRIDGES |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| BREWER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1922 |
1981 |
| BREMER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| BRASS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1840 |
1938 |
| BRADSHAW |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| BRABAZON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1913 |
2004 |
| BOWSER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| BOWER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| BOWEN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1883 |
1963 |
| BOOTH |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| BOOKMYER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| BONSER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1915 |
1915 |
| BOLDT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| BLIESSENER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| BLAIR |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1857 |
1900 |
| BITNER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1961 |
1961 |
| BILLINGS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1794 |
1860 |
| BICKLE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| BICKEL |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| BICE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1930 |
2005 |
| BIALK |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| BETTS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1875 |
1875 |
| BENCHLEY |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1954 |
1954 |
| BELKNAP |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| BEHRENS |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1997 |
1997 |
| BEEBE |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1926 |
1926 |
| BEAMISH |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| BAUNOCH PARKER |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1931 |
1996 |
| BASTON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1959 |
1959 |
| BASSETT |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| BASNER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1936 |
1995 |
| BARNUM |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1907 |
1907 |
| BARKELL |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| BALLENGASH |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| BALLARD |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1826 |
1893 |
| BALL |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1866 |
1866 |
| BALAMUCKI |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| BACHELOR |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1843 |
1862 |
| BABCOCK |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| AYERS |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1896 |
1953 |
| AVERY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1876 |
1876 |
| ASHER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1958 |
1958 |
| ASHBY |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| ARNOTT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| ARNOLDI |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1942 |
1942 |
| ARNDT |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1923 |
1923 |
| ARMSTRONG |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1957 |
1957 |
| ARAGON |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| ANKLAM |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| ANDERSON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| AMIDON |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
| AGER |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1942 |
1942 |
| ACRE |
1 |
1 |
0 |
|
|
| ACHTEN |
1 |
0 |
1 |
1966 |
1966 |
| ABERNATHY |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
Quite astonishing huh?
This is a story about my Stiles research. It does not include anyone “famous”, but most stories on family history do not.
Several years ago, I made contact with a descendant of Lucy Wellington through her daughter Augusta Wakefield. I descend from Augusta’s sister, Mary Wakefield (1831-before 1888) who married Wilbur Stiles (1827-1870). This contact was able to provide me with the names of the children of Wilbur and Mary who were known at that time – including a William Henry Stiles. At the time, she had found a William H Stiles in the census with a family in Genesee County Michigan, but did not know for sure if this was our William Henry Stiles. My gut told me it was, but gut feelings are not proof.
Then, almost 2 years ago, I made contact with a descendant of William H. Stiles from Genesee County. Her family story said that William’s mother was a Native American – possibly with the name of “Sue Bee” (or some variation of spelling). However, she could find no proof of that family legend. She did have the father as probably Wilbur Stiles.
The information that this cousin provided proved to me that we were indeed talking about the same family. She just wasn’t sure only because of the family legend, but again, my gut told me it was the same family. And the information that was provided coincided with the census information that was found earlier.
This however still was not definitive proof. The historian for the Stiles Family of America felt that it was not definitive enough proof to remove the missing link information for that family and to link it to my family. So the search continued.
I then broke down and ordered the military service and pension files for Wilbur Stiles Jr (1864-1938). In it, was a copy of a page from a Bible which served as his birth certificate.

As you can see above, the copy is not the best. What intrigued me though was the line under Wilbur F. Stiles at the bottom. It’s hard to see in this image, but there is a William H. Stiles listed – the lettering is just really light. It could be because it was written in pencil instead of pen, or it could be due to age I suppose. The thing is, it proved to me that there indeed was a son of Wilbur and Mary who was named William H. Stiles. My gut again told me that this was the same person as in the census and the ancestor of this newly discovered cousin from 2008. However, it was still not enough proof for many.
Then, today, March 8, 2010, I accessed another resource – pilot.familysearch.org. This website had images of the record books from the various counties in Michigan. Here I find the following pictures.
 The marriage of William H Stiles to Emma Elliott from the Lapeer County Michigan book of Marriages.
 The marriage record of William H Stiles and Mabel Gibbs as recorded in the Genesee County Michigan Marriage Record book.
Finally – I have proof that William H Stiles that my cousin descends from and that appeared in the later census records really is the son of Wilbur and Mary. My gut was right! This still doesn’t explain the “Native American” legend from that branch of the family – although quite frankly, many family legends in Michigan contain that fable. However, it doesn’t diminish my excitement for this discovery.
As we get older, the time seems to go by even faster. It seems that 2009 just started, and now it’s ending. Frankly, I’m glad it’s over. This year has been not a good one for me. I’ve had to close my online business due to the insane amount of money I was loosing on it. I lost my job when the old company that I was contracted to was bought out by another company and that new company did not want to continue the part of the business that had employed me. Since I was an “independent contractor” I had no benefits, so finding a new job was the top of the priority list. I luckily did find another job – but ended up leaving that one after 2 months as I couldn’t take the manager’s attitude anymore. Unfortunately, I wasn’t employed long enough to be eligible for any benefits, so once again, finding a new job was top priority. I had also found another “job” which allowed me to learn a little bit more about the insurance industry, but it was something that I could not do as I did not have the skills for it. Thankfully, I did find a new job with a brand new company – doing essentially what I had done before, but with more responsibilities. I’m still an Independent Contractor, but I love this job.
School has taken a very far back seat. The first half of the year I was “attending” but got nothing done. I then took a term break for the last half of the year. I’m starting back tomorrow, but really, my heart isn’t into it. But, it’s either that or start paying back the student loan, which I can’t afford. I hope that I can get into the swing of things and get the degree completed.
In July was the Stiles Family of America reunion – held in Providence, Rhode Island. I had to miss it due to having the 2 month job. I hated to miss it, especially when I had done all of the organizing for it. I understand everyone had a good time, but I still would have loved to attend the reunion that I organized…
Health wise, things have not really improved – my back still bothers me after 1 1/2 years after a back surgery. My blood sugar is getting worse according to the A1C test, and my roseacea is getting much worse. In fact, when I was at the dermatologist’s office last week, the nurse was instructed to take a picture of my face, and afterwards she compared the new pictures to the old ones and said “wow, you have really gotten worse!” and carried on with that sentiment for a while. Like I needed her to tell me that – I know my roseacea is worse – nothing is helping it.
Here’s to hoping that 2010 will be a better year. I’m hoping my job will not disappear again, so I remain employed the entire year. I’m hoping my health starts to improve and my blood sugar gets under control again. I’m hoping that I can get some of my debt paid down so I can find a new home of my own to move into in the Cincinnati area. I’m also hoping that I can get my BS in Information Technology degree finished.
I did a search on ancestry.com for my gr-gr-grandfather, John Rivers. I put in his birth and death information and found exactly 6 results – all in the family trees section. Out of those 6 results, 5 were public member trees and 1 was in OneWorld tree. I just thought I would check the public member trees to see if I could gather any new clues about John. What I found was both interesting and frankly rather disappointing.
Out of the 5 trees, 3 of them were the exact same tree – just submitted by 3 different people. These 3 had source citations – the exact same ones. Clearly, they were just copying each other. The other 2 were unsourced, but one of them was actually more useful and I am waiting to hear back from that person.
I point this out because the 3 trees that were carbon copies of each other have completely incorrect information in them that the other 2 trees had copied. The incorrect information is GLARINGLY incorrect which is what makes this so much worse. The 3 trees have him married twice and living in 2 different states in 1880.
According to these three trees, John was born 16 May 1823 in Montreal, Quebec, Canada and died 21 November 1902 in Taymouth [Township], Saginaw [County], Michigan. This sort of coincides with information that I have (although I have his birth as April 1824).
The 3 trees have John married twice with his first wife as an Elizabeth and two children – Elizabeth Betsy and Susannah. The problem is this can NOT possibly have been the same John Rivers. The wife Elizabeth has a birth of 1765 and a death of 1810 (her death is 13 years BEFORE John Rivers was born – how could they have been married?). The daughter Elizabeth Betsy Rivers was born 12 Jan 1780 in Virginia and died 1822 in Green Kentucky. The daughter Susannah was born 25 Dec 1783 in Virginia and died 1824 in Green Kentucky. Both daughters were born before their father was born???? Come on – it’s obvious that this family does not belong with the John Rivers born in 1823/4 in Montreal Canada.
These 3 family trees also give that John Rivers was living in 2 different states in 1880 – one in Albee [Township], Saginaw [County], Michigan (who is my gr-gr-grandfather) and one in Newport, Orleans, Vermont. The census for Vermont gives his age as 56 born Canada and lists only children who were born in Vermont with him – John age 24, Fredie age 18, Annie age 15, Melvina age 13 and Eugene age 10. The census for Michigan gives John as age 55 born Canada with wife Jane (Francis Jane) age 34, children Betsey age 16, John age 14, Thomas age 10, Gardner age 8, Birtie (Burt Eugene) age 4 and Daniel (James Daniel) age 1. All the children were born in Michigan. The ONLY things that the Vermont John Rivers shares with my gr-gr-grandfather is his name and birth year/general place. It is a coincidence that these two happen to have the same name and same birth year/general place. It is clear that these are 2 separate and different John Rivers. They are not the same person as these 3 trees suggest.
I really wish that people would just not copy information and tout it as accurate without examining the evidence. This is a perfect example of why you cannot count on the information in the family trees section of ancestry.com. It provides clues only – not truths. And in this case – not very good clues even.
Oh. The one tree that was more useful was a tree that was unsourced (which always makes me a little suspicious), but was one that did NOT just copy information from the others. Yes, the birth of John was copied, but it only listed one wife and one child (which is inaccurate). But it gave more information on that child – that Daniel was married twice (which I knew and the names matched) and had at least 2 kids – one by each wife. That was new – I didn’t know about the 2nd child. This person was clearly a descendant of the 2nd child by the 2nd wife and was completely new information to me. That is why I pursued contact with this person and am waiting for a response now. Am I taking it as gospel? No, not until I make contact with that contributor and verify the information.
The Stiles Family of America DNA project got started in July of 2007. As of September 20, 2009, there have been over 80 participants in our study. Out of that number, only 49 have the Stiles/Styles surname. The rest have other surnames – mostly unrelated men, although some have maternal Stiles descent. For the purposes of this discussion, I will only concentrate on the 49 Stiles/Styles surnamed men as it is their DNA that has the most meaning for the surname of Stiles/Styles.
Of the 49 Stiles/Styles participants, 13 have believed they are descendant of Robert Stiles (1637 – 1690) who died in Boxford, Massachusetts; 11 have believed they are descendant of John Stiles (1595 – 1662) who died in Connecticut; while the remaining 14 had various lineages of descent not from Robert or John. The lineage was based on paper data gathered over the years from census, tax lists, bible records, documented histories, etc. One participant has not provided any type of paper lineage for himself which makes it hard to do a full comparison, although it will be noted that his DNA does not match anyone else’s in the study.
The DNA evidence has proven 10 distinct groups of relatives out of the 49 who have had their DNA tested so far. One of those groups is actually a group of 12 totally unrelated men – they are not related to anyone else in our DNA study at present time (not even related to each other). I have grouped them together only because it makes looking at the data a little easier.
Those who believe they descend from Robert Stiles (1637-1690) of Boxford, Massachusetts, actually fall into 2 distinct groups. Ten men are clearly related to each other, while the remaining 3 are related to each other, but not related to the other ten men. The three men who are not related to the others all descend from Robert’s grandson Israel (1716 – 1791) and Israel’s son John (1736 – 1785). The DNA however, has not told us if it was Israel or John who was adopted since there has not yet been a participant from a descendant of any of Israel’s other sons (Moses, Isaac, Samuel or Robert). If one of those descendants were to have their DNA tested, that could indicate if it was Israel or John who was adopted.
There are 11 DNA participants that traced their lineage to John Stiles (1595 – 1662 CT). Of those, 1 traces descent from John’s son Henry, 6 trace to John’s son Isaac and 4 trace to John’s son John.
Of those who trace their descent to Isaac, 1 traces to Isaac’s son John and 5 to Isaac’s son Jonathan “Long Jonathan”. The one who traces to Isaac’s son John is unrelated to any other participant. Could this John, the son of Isaac, be adopted? Hard to say as we would need more descendants of this John to test.
Of those who trace their descent to Jonathan “Long Jonathan”, 2 trace to his son Jonathan Jr (and also Jonathan III and his son Jacob). The descendants of Jonathan happens to match the DNA of descendant of Henry the son of John (1595-1662). So, either the Jonathan that was Jonathan “Long Jonathan”’s son was really a descendant of Henry, or the descendant of Henry was really the descendant of Jonathan II. It’s hard to say which for sure because we don’t have any other descendant of Henry in the DNA study. By the way, the descendant of Henry is one that had his lineage just revised to be a descendant of Henry rather than a descendant of a William (who doesn’t even factor into this study yet).
Of those who trace their descent to Jonathan “Long Jonathan”, 3 trace to his son Stephen. Of those 3, 2 trace their descent to Stephen’s son Aaron and one traces to Stephen’s son William. Interestingly, the 2 who trace their descent to Aaron match according to the DNA and the one who traces to William does not match anyone else in the DNA study. This leads me to believe that William may have been adopted, but again, we need more DNA data from William’s descendants to be sure.
Of those who trace their descent to John son of John (1595-1662), 3 trace their descent to Ephraim Sr (grandson of the immigrant John born 1595) and 1 traces to John III. Interestingly, the one that traces to John III matches DNA with those who trace descent from Joseph (b 1648 Eng). So, could John III be adopted? Hard to say until we get more DNA evidence.
Of those who trace their descent to Ephraim Sr, 2 trace their descent to Ephraim’s son Ephraim and one traces to Ephraim Sr’s son Isaac. The 2 that trace their descent to Ephraim Jr, one traces to Ephraim Jr’s son Eli and the other to Ephraim Jr’s son Simeon. Now, none of these three men match any other participant. This leads me to think that perhaps Isaac – son of Ephraim Sr was adopted. In addition, I’m thinking that either Eli or Simeon were adopted by Ephraim Jr – but which one? It’s hard to say for sure because we don’t have enough DNA evidence.
In conclusion, the DNA study has proven that what we thought was accurate in the paper genealogical trail is inaccurate as there are clearly some adoptions (or more correctly “non-paternal” events) that happened somewhat frequently. It has allowed us to connect some long-lost relatives together (consolidating some of our missing link families) and shown us that we need to keep searching the paper records. One thing that is clear from this analysis is that we need more DNA tested – and for the participants to share their genealogical lineage with us so we can further examine the paper records. Only through active participation and collaboration will we start to unravel the mysteries of the Stiles/Styles lineages.
|
|